Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sumter v. Simmer et al
as 3:2023cv06759
Plaintiff:
Jareca Talena Sumter and Jareca Sumter
Defendant:
Curtis Loftis, Dr. Edwards Simmer, Gina M Raimonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hagan v. Delosh et al
as 2:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Demetrius J. Hagan
Defendant:
Penny L. Delosh, Mary McDuffie and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bey v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
Johnny Kendric Hackel Bey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi doing business as Commissioner of United States Social Security Admin.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Owens v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Mildred Deloris Owens
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Mark Warshawsky, Stephen Evangelista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Woodson Drumheller v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WOODSON T. DRUMHELLER
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Charlene Benson v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLENE ANN BENSON
Plaintiff:
SAM EDWARD BENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
