Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,478
Hosea Robinson v. State of Missouri, et al
as 23-3680
Plaintiff / Appellant: Hosea Lee Robinson
Defendant / Appellee: State of Missouri, Kimberly Gardner and Andrew Mossman, State of Missouri- Public Defender
Moon v. Bramlett We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01530
Plaintiff: Darnell W. Moon
Defendant: Kimberly Bramlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Stanley v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04223
Plaintiff: Dairian Eugene Stanley
Defendant: Anne L. Precythe, Travis Terry, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02139
Plaintiff: Kimberly Walker
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Mitchell v. Eichele et al
as 2:2023cv04224
Plaintiff: Curtis Mitchell
Defendant: Kimberly Eichele, Ryan Williams, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03594
Plaintiff: Kimberly Walker and James Thomas
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bell v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04211
Defendant: Registered Agent Sanofi US Services, Inc, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis US Inc
Plaintiff: Kimberly Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stottlemire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03230
Plaintiff: Jack Stottlemire and Kimberly Stottlemire
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3299
Plaintiff / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00980
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?