Cases 1 - 10 of 163
BLANEY v. MIKE et al
as 2:2024cv05122
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY
Defendant:
MIKE SCREENER, BERGENFIELD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS, INC, ENRIQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZHANG v. DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO. et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
JEFF BAOLIANG ZHANG
Defendant:
DORRANCE PUBLISHING CO., MICHAEL KNAPP and VICKIE KOWALECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jamey McKee v. M. Knapp, et al
as 24-1384
Plaintiff:
JAMEY MCKEE
Defendant:
M. KNAPP, Unit Manager at SCI Rockview and D.A. MINNOIA, Counselor at SCI Rockview
Kevin Coit v. L. Malichaik, et al
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
L. MALICHAIK, RLPM, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Superintendent, M. ROWE, DSCS and others
KNAPP et al v. INDIVIOR, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
MR. GUY KNAPP, MR. WILLIAM KNAPP and MR. PHILLIP L. MILLER
Defendant:
INDIVIOR, INC., AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC., RECKITT BENCKISER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Jerome Washington v. Rowe, et al
as 23-3060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DSCS ROWE, Deputy Superintendent and KNAPP, Captain, Unit Manager
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley v. Salamon et al
as 3:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
Antonio James Hawley
Defendant:
Warden Bobbi Jo Salamon, New RHU Unit Manager Cris Miller, Lt. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
