Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Marshall v. State of Texas Department of Transportation et al
as 4:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
State of Texas Department of Transportation, State Bar Texas, Texas Education Agency Department of Education Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Sununu et al
as 1:2023fp00228
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
Christopher Sununu, Judd Gregg, Pembroke Academy High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall et al v. U.S. Secret Service et al
as 1:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall and Jackal of Trades, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Secret Service, Debra Rhodes, Aradin Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Marshall v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
School Nurse Darin Taylor, School Aid Theresa Taylor, Religious Pope Bob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marshall et al v. Pellenz Law et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall, Lily Marshall and Milton Davison
Defendant:
Pellenz Law, State of Texas Dept of Transportation, Scott "B" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison et al v. Century 21 Select Real Estate Folsom et al
as 2:2015cv00991
Plaintiff:
Milton J. Davison and Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
Century 21 Select Real Estate Folsom, Stanley Binion & Associates, With Sinc Community Housing F.R.D.T. Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Krystal Marshall v. Robert Nilram, et al
as 12-17154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRYSTAL MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT NILRAM, DAWN NILRAM, LEWISTOWN CHURCH OF CHRIST, Lewistown, PA and others
Marshall v. Nilram et al
as 2:2009cv02148
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
Robert Nilram, Dawn Nilram and Lewistown Church of Christ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
