Cases 51 - 60 of 64
United States v. Kyle Thomas Soltesz
as 13-1511
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kyle Thomas Soltesz
Thomas v. Miller et al
as 5:2013cv00023
Petitioner:
Kyle Thomas
Respondent:
Chad Miller and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Magic Cross Ranch, LP v. Manion et al
as 4:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Magic Cross Ranch, LP
Defendant:
Tommy Manion , Tommy Manion of Texas, Inc. and Kyle Thomas Manion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Magic Cross Ranch, LP v. Manion et al
as 3:2012cv00541
Plaintiff:
Magic Cross Ranch, LP
Defendant:
Tommy Manion, Tommy Manion of Texas, Inc. and Kyle Thomas Manion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Kyle Brennan v. Church Of Scientology Flag Ser, et al
as 12-10024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE THOMAS BRENNAN, Estate of
Defendant - Appellee:
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC., DENISE GENTILE, GERALD GENTILE and others
Smith et al v. Wood et al
as 3:2011cv05648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith , Kyle Thomas , Kory Kerzman and others
Defendant:
Gary Wood and F/V Kris Ty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
American Academy of Husband-Coached Childbirth v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv02899
Plaintiff:
American Academy of Husband-Coached Childbirth
Defendant:
Kyle Thomas, Naomi Thomas, Ellen Contard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Estate of Kyle Brennan v. Church Of Scientology
as 10-14967
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ESTATE OF KYLE THOMAS BRENNAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC.
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas v. Stewart Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2010cv00663
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thomas
Defendant:
Stewart Co. Sheriff Dept. and John Vinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
