Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MORRIS v. GEO et al
as 3:2023cv24757
Plaintiff:
AREALEUS K MORRIS
Defendant:
GEO, MEDICAL PROVIDER AT BLACKWATER, L BERRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Berrios v. Bailey et al
as 5:2023cv05019
Plaintiff:
Mitchell L. Berrios
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Bailey, Nancy Pryor and Corporal Harwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. ROGERS et al
as 3:2022cv23142
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE JAVAR THOMAS
Defendant:
ROGERS and L BERRIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Berrios
as 1:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert L. Berrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Haywood v. Gondek et al
as 1:2021cv06542
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
E. Gondek, A. McGee, Y. Tefledzhuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Robert Berrios
as 21-1766
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT L. BERRIOS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Doble Seis Sport TV, Inc., et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 21-1033
Plaintiff:
L & C ENTERTAINMENT GAMES, INC, LROD, INC., JUAN C. COTTO-GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO'S ENTERTAINMENT, CORP., RAMON RIVERA-FIGUEROA, ELECTRONIC GAMES, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and RAUL MALDONADO GAUTIER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
