Cases 1 - 10 of 2,640
Bergeron et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd
as 1:2024cv03438
Plaintiff:
Dominique Elise Bergeron, Brandon L Williams, Jr., Derric Lavar Fulks and others
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross (ID 116253) v. Williams
as 5:2024cv03031
Petitioner:
Michael C. Ross
Respondent:
Thomas L. Williams and Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Nancie L. Williams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Williams v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02732
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corporation
Plaintiff:
Shalace L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Clark v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff:
Orlandus Clark
Defendant:
L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01680
Plaintiff:
Cathy L Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Nichole L. Williams
Defendant:
Markeith L. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
