Cases 1 - 10 of 1,729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01503
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01504
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tabernacle Church Joint Board et al v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ezell Foster, Tabernacle Church Joint Board, Antonio R Daggett Sr. and others
Defendant:
Takenya Julkes, Roy L Davis, Princella Askew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Land Home Financial Services Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Earl L Davis
Defendant:
Land Home Financial Services Inc and U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Moore v. Grant County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Davis and Joshua Lamar Moore
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care, Tracy Sullivan, Lori Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Horn et al
as 7:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dean McCormick
Defendant:
Mack Earnest Horn and Janice L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. City of Dadeville (City) et al (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00463
Defendant:
Mitzy Hidding, Peter Golden, Frank Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Stanton Sullivan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. DeJoy
as 1:2024cv06667
Plaintiff:
Annie L Davis
Defendant:
LOUIS DeJOY, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
