Cases 1 - 10 of 1,702
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cain et al v. Lincoln Financial Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Diane Cain and Diane L. Davis-Cain
Defendant:
Lincoln Financial Insurance Agency Inc., Lincoln Financial Securities Corporation and Lincoln Financial Advisors Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Davis v. Hamrick et al
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
Howard S. Hamrick and Walnut Ridge Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Robert L. Davis v. David Holbrook et al
as 2:2024cv03213
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
David Holbrook and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Janice L. Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
(PC) Morgan v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Mike Morgan
Defendant:
L. Davies, J. Hall and A. Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65141
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Davis
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lord v. U.S. Marshall Ralph Sozio
as 24-789
Plaintiff:
KRIS LORD
Defendant:
U.S. Marshall RALPH SOZIO, U.S. Marshall Director RONALD L. DAVIS, U.S. Marshall VINCENT F. DEMARCO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
