Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Jefferson v. Gibbons et al
as 2:2011cv02100
Plaintiff:
Myron Deon Jefferson
Defendant:
William L. Gibbons and Mary Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbons v. Bayer Healthcare AG et al
as 3:2011cv10371
Plaintiff:
Chelsey L. Gibbons
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Schering Pharma A G, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
William Acey v. Mary Thomas, et al
as 10-5899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. ACEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY THOMAS, alleged to be the foreperson of the grand jury that indicted Plaintiff, W. H. SWEET, alleged to be the foreperson of the grand jury that indicted Plaintiff and WILLIAM L. GIBBONS, the District Attorney General for the Thirtieth Judicial District at Memphis
Staggs v. Stephenson et al
as 4:2010cv01082
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Aaron Staggs
Defendant:
Chad Stephenson, Tony Haley, David L Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julius Andrews v. William Gibbons, et al
as 10-5882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS T. ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM L. GIBBONS, Attorney General and MARY THOMAS, Foreperson
Taylor v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02476
Plaintiff:
Derek Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Mary Thomas and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dancy v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02470
Plaintiff:
Louis D. Dancy
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02471
Plaintiff:
Carlee L. Williams
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acey v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02428
Plaintiff:
William L. Acey
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins v. Thomas et al
as 2:2010cv02427
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Atkins
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, W.H. Sweet and William L. Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
