Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Cheryl L. Harris v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv01575
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harris et al v. CIT Bank, N.A.
as 1:2018cv00747
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Patricia D. Harris and Tommy L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Harris v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Regina L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harris et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04108
Plaintiff:
Robert L Harris and Octavia Jean Harris
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv02168
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harris, III and Connie L. Harris
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National Default Servicing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harris v. Davis et al
as 3:2017cv03269
Plaintiff:
Maurice L. Harris
Defendant:
Ron Davis and Kelly Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walmsley v. RCO Legal, PC et al
as 1:2016cv01551
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, John Doe 1-10, Steven L. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Walmsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Harris v. USA
as 2:2016cv01224
Petitioner:
David L. Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2016cv00941
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Harris
Defendant:
United States District Court , John A. Houston and Jill L. Burkhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
