Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LeDoux v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2026cv02218
Plaintiff:
Tracey Scott LeDoux
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Anderson v. City of Duluth et al
as 0:2026cv04244
Plaintiff:
Cedric Scott Anderson
Defendant:
City of Duluth, David Decker, Ian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Kansas et al
as 5:2026cv03318
Plaintiff:
Kyle Joseph Sutton
Defendant:
Unified Government of Wyandotte County, Kansas, Jakob Blackman, Blake McMahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeDoux v. Bisignano
as 0:2026cv03552
Plaintiff:
Renae Ann LeDoux
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Baillie et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv10062
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Baillie, Ceanna S. Bloom-Ledoux and I.B.
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Communities, LLC, Southeast Housing, LLC, Balfour Beatty Military Housing Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ledoux v. B P America Production Co et al
as 6:2026cv00891
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ledoux
Defendant:
B P America Production Co and Woodside Energy Americas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 3:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
J. Thompson, Mrs. M. Ledoux, Mr. J. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Schutte et al
as 0:2026cv00186
Plaintiff:
Cedric Scott Anderson
Defendant:
Sarah Schutte, Chaney, Ledoux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricks v. Murrill et al
as 3:2025cv01092
Defendant:
Elizabeth Murrill, Terrel T. Kent, Sheryl M. Ranatza and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.