Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Moore v. Inabinet et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv04229
Defendant: C Carter, Robert Brannon, Bryan P Stirling and others
Plaintiff: Tony L Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. USA
as 4:2020cv81430
Petitioner: Parnell L. Moore
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Batts, et al. v. Ditta, et al.
as 5:2018ct03060
Plaintiff: Titus Lamont Batts, Erik Everett-El, Eddie L. Brooks-Bey and others
Defendant: Michael Ditta, Betty Brown, FNU Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mosley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv02461
Petitioner: Michael L Moore
Respondent: Bonita Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. DeVine et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv03709
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Mitchell, Jr
Defendant: Nancy DeVine, Nikki Lyndsy, Chelesy L Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Michael Moore
as 16-6905
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: MICHAEL L. MOORE
Moore v. USA
as 3:2016cv00227
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Michael L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Clarke
as 1:2015cv01449
Petitioner: Keyant'a L. Moore
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITAKER v. HINSHAW et al
as 1:2015cv00737
Plaintiff: RODNEY KEITH WHITAKER
Defendant: HINSHAW, L. MOORE, D. LENTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Hoye v. Harold Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES HOYE
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, GARY L. BASS, Reg. Administrator, Virginia Department of Corrections Central Regional Office, SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?