Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Silva v. Auld et al
as 4:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Daniel Silva
Defendant:
L. Patrick Auld, William Campbell, Rascoe S. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. L. Auld
as 21-2289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DISTRICT COURT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
ALLEN v. AULD et al
as 1:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DISTRICT COURT JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOHAMMAD v. AULD
as 1:2017cv00670
Plaintiff:
BASIR RAZZAK MOHAMMAD
Defendant:
L. PATRICK AULD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 17-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Odell Golden v. Catherine Eagle
as 16-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ODELL GENE GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE C. EAGLES and L. PATRICK AULD
GOLDEN v. EAGLES et al
as 1:2015cv00984
Plaintiff:
ODELL GENE GOLDEN
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. EAGLES and L. PATRICK AULD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RATLIFF v. AULD
as 1:2015cv00974
Plaintiff:
LEON RATLIFF
Defendant:
L. PATRICK AULD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David Bardes v. L. Auld
as 15-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. BARDES, individually, as a taxpayer
Defendant - Appellee:
L. PATRICK AULD, Magistrate Judge, CATHERINE C. EAGLES, District Judge, PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, Senior U.S. District Judge and others
Bardes v. Auld et al
as 1:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
David A. Bardes
Defendant:
L. Patrick Auld, Catherine C. Eagles, Patrick Michael Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
