Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Rodriguez et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01193
Plaintiff:
Rosa Carmina Rodriguez , Alexis E. Agostini , Raymond U. Arroyo and others
Defendant:
The United States of America, The U.S. Office of Personnel Management and Katherine Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2014cv01190
Plaintiff:
Rosa Carmina Rodriguez, Alexis E. Agostini, Raymond U. Arroyo and others
Rosario v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2013cv01627
Plaintiff:
Carmen L. Rosario
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Michael L. Rosario v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv05839
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Rosario
Rosario v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03157
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Angel L. Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2012cv01454
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
M M Mitchell, L. Rosario and R. Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario-Vazquez v. Selles-Guerrini
as 3:2011cv01814
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Rosario-Vazquez
Defendant:
Arlene De Lourdes Selles-Guerrini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CELANO et al v. COTE et al
as 2:2011cv04727
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL V. CELANO, SR. and PATRICIA ANN CELANO
Defendant:
MARGARET R. COTE, GEORGE M. COTE, GLENN R. FEJFAR and others
Cross_claimant:
GLENN R. FEJFAR
Cross_defendant:
GEORGE M. COTE, MARGARET R. COTE, DEF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Stine et al
as 6:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
D. L. Stine, M. M. Mitchell, L. Gregorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stine et al
as 5:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
Shyheem Lee Smith
Defendant:
D. L. Stine, M. M. Mitchell, L. Gregorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
