Cases 21 - 30 of 129
PRCI Loan LLC v. Cofresi-Capestany et al
as 3:2020cv01656
Defendant:
MIRADOR DE LA GLORIA INC., Ivan Cofresi-Capestany, Legal Conjugal Partnership Arbaje/Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
PRCI Loan LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Uselton v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
David Shinn, Centurian Managed Care, E Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
John Stevenson Uselton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBUGYEI v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv13958
Defendant:
OFC. B. SNOW, OFC. S. BURTON, SGT. L. TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ERIC B. OBUGYEI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05540
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00645
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Torres
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TORRES MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15354
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L TORRES MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Givens et al
as 5:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Sergeant Dennis M. Cosenza, Captain Sammie S. Valero, FNU Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Perzia Bakari Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Juan Torres-Mate, Torres Scrap Metal, Nery L Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
In re: Jorge Torres
as 19-14526
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JORGE L. TORRES
Torres v. May
as 1:2019cv02175
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Petitioner:
Angel L. Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
