Cases 1 - 10 of 54
L.W. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05649
Plaintiff:
L. W.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15549
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gregory Brown v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 23-35145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary of Corrections, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, in their individual and official capacities, SCOTT J. RUSSEL, Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
Enrique Diaz v. ODOC, et al
as 22-35675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE ZACARIAS DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. CURHA, N. VANWECHAL and others
Brown v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Stephen Sinclair, Scott Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Diaz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Enrique Zacarias Diaz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Curha, N. Vanwechal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
