Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BOVA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. BOVA , RICHIE BAKER , CORA FRYE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Wolcott et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05144
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Wolcott and Jesse L Wolcott
Defendant:
State of Washington , Timothy Anable , Jane Doe Anable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolcott v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2010gd50089
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Wolcott
Defendant:
General Electric Company , GE Healthcare AS , GE Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolcott v. General Electric Company et al
as 6:2010cv01386
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Wolcott
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare AS, GE Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Laney v. Wolcott
as 2:2010cv00593
Plaintiff:
Randal Laney
Defendant:
L. Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowell v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowell
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laney v. Wolcott
as 5:2009cv05031
Plaintiff:
Randal Laney
Defendant:
L. Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bun v. Felker et al
as 2:2009cv00631
Plaintiff:
Chanthon Bun
Defendant:
T. Felker, Wright, R Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Colbert v. A. Audette, et al
as 08-16797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE KENNETH COLBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
A. AUDETTE, H. BATES, B HURLBERT and others
Butler v. Wolcott et al
as 2:2008at00428
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Butler
Defendant:
L Wolcott and B. Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
