Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mulder v. Baca et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Mulder
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Brannon, Beisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizabeth Carley v. Romeo Aranus, et al
as 23-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANUS
Defendant:
NEVEN, Warden, GENTRY, Warden, DZURENDA, Director and others
LEE v. FISCUS et al
as 1:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
DONOVON LEE
Defendant:
L. FISCUS, CAPTAIN FRANK SALVAY, LIEUTENANT L.V. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chavaria v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Erik Chavaria
Defendant:
Michael Minev, L Barnum, S.L. Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01348
Plaintiff:
SEAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and SANDY L.V. BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2014cv00214
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas and L.V. Metro Police
Plaintiff:
Robin M. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightner et al v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
William Lightner and Marcia Lightner
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Pam Sonnen, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Nichols v. Lynne Abraham, et al
as 08-2833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO J. NICHOLS
Defendant:
LYNNE M. ABRAHAM, SANDY L.V. BYRD and PAMELA P. DEMBE
NICHOLS v. ABRAHAM et al
as 2:2008cv02161
Plaintiff:
LORENZO J. NICHOLS
Defendant:
LYNNE M. ABRAHAM, SANDY L.V. BYRD and PAMELA PRYOR DEMBE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKenney v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2007cv01735
Plaintiff:
Joe L. McKenney, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert J Hernandez, M.F. Stout, L.V. Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
