Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Sanford v. LA-Z-Boy, Inc.
as 5:2024cv10005
Plaintiff:
Josh Sanford
Defendant:
LA-Z-Boy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AR Design Innovations LLC v. LA-Z-BOY, INC.
as 4:2020cv00395
Defendant:
LA-Z-BOY, INC.
Plaintiff:
AR Design Innovations LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
AR Design Innovations LLC v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
AR Design Innovations LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
LA-Z-BOY, INC. and Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Magistrate Judge Christine A Nowak and Scott Woloson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heuglin et al v. La-Z-Boy Logistics, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00986
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Heuglin and Andrea Ayres
Defendant:
Earl Lynn Presley, La-Z-Boy, Inc. and La-Z-Boy Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shoffnerkalthoff MES, Inc. v. Rudolph/Libbe, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Rudolph/Libbe, Inc. and La-Z-Boy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shoffnerkalthoff MES, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00977
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Accent Masonry & Construction, LLC v. Rudolph/Libbe, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Rudolph/Libbe, Inc. and La-Z-Boy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Accent Masonry & Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
