Cases 1 - 10 of 36
LabMD, Inc. v. USA
as 23-11431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LABMD, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daugherty et al v. Cause of Action Institute et al
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Daugherty and LabMD, Inc.
Defendant:
Cause of Action Institute, Dinsmore and Shohl, LLP, Koch Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Daugherty, et al v. Alain Sheer, et al
as 22-5103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael J. Daugherty and LabMD, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Alain H. Sheer, in his individual capacity, Ruth T. Yodaiken, in her individual capacity, Carl H. Settlemyer, III, in his individual capacity and others
LabMD, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
as 1:2021cv03525
Plaintiff:
LabMD, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission
LabMD Inc v. Tiversa Holding Corp, et al
as 21-1429
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LABMD INC
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. BOBACK and TIVERSA HOLDING CORP
LabMD Inc v. Tiversa Holding Corp, et al
as 20-3316
Defendant / Appellee:
TIVERSA HOLDING CORP, FKA Tiversa Inc and ROBERT J. BOBACK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LABMD INC
Appellant:
MARC E. DAVIES
LabMD Inc v. Tiversa Holding Corp, et al
as 20-3191
Defendant / Appellee:
TIVERSA HOLDING CORP, FKA Tiversa Inc and ROBERT J. BOBACK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LABMD INC
LabMD, INC. V THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE ET AL
as 2:2020cv00766
Defendant:
ROBERT J. BOBACK, THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE, REED SMITH LLP and others
Plaintiff:
LABMD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LABMD Inc v. Tiversa Holding Corp, et al
as 20-1731
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ERIC JOHNSON, TIVERSA HOLDING CORP, FKA Tiversa Inc and ROBERT J. BOBACK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LABMD INC
LABMD Inc v. Tiversa Holding Corp, et al
as 20-1732
Appellant:
JAMES W. HAWKINS, Esq.
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ERIC JOHNSON, TIVERSA HOLDING CORP, FKA Tiversa Inc and ROBERT J. BOBACK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LABMD INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
