Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Sutton v. VanLeeuwen et al
as 1:2014cv02379
Defendant:
Remax Incorporated, Social Security Administration, The, Anthony Roderick and others
Plaintiff:
Isha Roberts, Joshua Lamont Sutton and Joshua Sutton
Petitioner:
Thomas Bradford Flesher, J. Murray, Larry Charles Schwartz and others
Interested Party:
Case Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Rathman
as 2:2014cv01211
Petitioner:
Larry Charles Welch
Respondent:
Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lilly et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv17617
Plaintiff:
Dixie Lilly and Larry Charles Lilly, Sr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larry Welch v. USA
as 14-11753
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY CHARLES WELCH
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHARLES v. HARRY et al
as 2:2014cv00189
Petitioner:
LARRY CHARLES
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHARLES v. HARRY et al
as 2:2013cv07548
Petitioner:
LARRY CHARLES
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Furr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Furr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Furr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Larry Charles Furr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Larry Snow, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-15850
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY CHARLES SNOW, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director ADOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
