Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kenneth Allen v. Robert Carter, et al
as 23-2120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, Warden, DUSHAN ZATECHY and others
Fowler v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00601
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Larry Fowler
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, MR. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Martin v. Larry Fowler, et al
as 19-2618
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA ASH, PENNY EDEN, LARRY FOWLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
MARTIN v. ZANTECKY et al
as 1:2018cv02443
Defendant:
LARRY FOWLER, PENNY EDEN, ISP and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. FOWLER et al
as 1:2018cv00992
Defendant:
ALSIP, LISA ASH, BADE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen Vaughn, Jr. v. Indiana Department of Correcti, et al
as 11-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LINDA VANNATTA, LARRY FOWLER and others
VAUGHN v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00979
Defendant:
LARRY FOWLER, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, ALBERT POTTER and others
Plaintiff:
ALLEN E. VAUGHN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUSHINGBERRY v. FOWLER
as 1:2011cv00636
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMONT CUSHINGBERRY
Defendant:
LARRY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. FINNAN et al
as 1:2011cv00524
Defendant:
LISA ASH, DANIEL BODLOVICH, EDWIN BUSS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
