Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hogan v. Rutherford Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Francis M. Hogan, Jr.
Defendant:
Rutherford Correctional Center, Larry Godwin, Timothy Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety
as 1:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
S. Shane Smith
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Todd Ishee, Ladonna Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00437
Defendant:
Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, John Doe Corporations 1-50, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Godwin and Linda Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Godwin
as 1:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Omar Lee
Defendant:
Larry Godwin
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
v. GODWIN et al
as 3:2018cv01212
Defendant:
LARRY GODWIN, JR, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODWIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01213
Plaintiff:
LARRY GODWIN, JR
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv02211
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee , County of Shelby, Tennessee, Shelby County Rape Crisis Center and others
Plaintiff:
Meaghan Ybos , Madison Graves and Rachel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raymond Carr v. Raymond Booker, et al
as 14-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEON CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden, DARRELL STEWARD, Deputy Warden, CORNELL HOWARD and others
Carr v. Booker et al
as 2:2012cv15074
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carr
Defendant:
Darrell Steward , Cornell Howard, Annae Sanders and others
Simpson v. Brock et al
as 2:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
Milton Leon Simpson
Defendant:
J. Brock, M. Biggs, Johnny Kumpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
