Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SATTERWHITE v. NAUGLE et al
as 4:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
CHRIS EDWARD SATTERWHITE
Defendant:
BRAD NAUGLE, LARRY MEDLOCK, AMY NEWLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAMBORSKY v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv00428
Plaintiff:
TIM HAMBORSKY
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, NANCY VERNON, THOMAS O'BARTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERENCZ v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
SHANNON FERENCZ
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, BRIAN MILLER, GEARY O'NEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CURRIN v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2011cv01006
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL CURRIN
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, BARRY CROFTCHECK, TIMMIE BURNSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RECKNER v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE et al
as 2:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL RECKNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE , FAYETTE COUNTY PRISON BOARD , LARRY MEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv01741
Plaintiff:
EUGENE M. PRATT
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, LARRY MEDLOCK, JEFF BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LILLEY v. LUZAR et al
as 2:2009cv01236
Plaintiff:
WENDELL SCOTT LILLEY, JR.
Defendant:
LOUIS LUZAR, VINCE ZAPOTOSKY, ANGELA ZIMMERLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WYLAND v. BROWNFIELD et al
as 2:2008cv01601
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WYLAND
Defendant:
GARY BROWNFIELD, ANGELA ZIMMERLINK, VINCENT VICITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE JOHNSON and LORRAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, GEARY O'NEIL, ANTHONY DELVERME and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANNIS v. THE FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2007cv01628
Plaintiff:
SETH ANNIS
Defendant:
THE FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, LARRY MEDLOCK, BARRY CROFTCHECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
