Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Aikens v. Lashley et al
as 5:2023cv12435
Plaintiff:
Allen Aikens
Defendant:
Lashley, Noah Nagy and Heidi E. Washington
Victoria Whorton v. Cognitians, LLC, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTORIA A. WHORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OH PROBATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Attn: William Lashley and Carlos Walker, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OH, Attn: Debbie Lieberman and Michael Colbert, COUNSELOR SOCIAL WORKER MARRIAGE FAMILY THERAPIST BOARD, Attn: William Hegarty and others
Harp v. Hallett et al
as 5:2019cv13789
Defendant:
Lashley, Transportation Officers, Victoria Hallett and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harp
Glover et al v. Rivas et al
as 2:2019cv13406
Defendant:
Michael Kennedy, Stacey Purdy, Nurse Bills and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Glover, R. G. and Richard Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lashley v. Sloan
as 4:2017cv01645
Petitioner:
Elijah J. Lashley, Sr.
Respondent:
Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lashley v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 1:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lashley
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Herron v. Voyles et al
as 2:2015cv02145
Plaintiff:
Keith Herron
Defendant:
D. Voyles, J. Cline, R Woolley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop et al v. Trooper Jared Clemons et al
as 4:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bishop and Jeff Bishop
Defendant:
Jared Clemons and Lyle Lashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dey El v. Kirsch et al
as 2:2013cv02449
Plaintiff:
Phanoh Ra Dey El
Defendant:
George Kirsch, Shapiro and Kirsch, LLP, PHH Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
