Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Clark et al v. Block
as 2:2026cv03179
Plaintiff: Melinda Prewitt, Christopher Clark and Melinda Laster
Defendant: Hal D. Block
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LASTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv03099
Defendant: ERIN PETTIGREW, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER and others
Plaintiff: JUSTIN LASTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Laster v. Ritter
as 26-2425
Petitioner: KEITH LASTER
Respondent: Superintendent RITTER
John Berman v. Joan Synenberg, et al
as 26-3750
Plaintiff: JOHN BERMAN
Defendant: JUDGE JOAN SYNENBERG, Official Capacity, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, NAILAH KHADIJAH BYRD, Official Capacity, Clerk of Courts, Cuyahoga County, ROBERT VAUGHN, Official Capacity, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Ohio and others
Laster v. Social Security et al
as 4:2026cv06848
Plaintiff: Willie Laster
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Laster v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07970
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Lashawn Laster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(SS) Laster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv05935
Plaintiff: Brien Scott Laster
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01583
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Laster v. Ritter
as 26-1636
Petitioner: KEITH LASTER
Respondent: Superintendent RITTER
Laster v. Ritter
as 6:2026cv06485
Petitioner: Keith Laster
Respondent: Superintendent Ritter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?