Cases 141 - 150 of 406
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lear Corporation v. TS Tech USA Corporation et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv14302
Plaintiff:
Lear Corporation
Defendant:
TS Tech USA Corporation, TS Tech North America, Inc. and TS Tech Canada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JOHNSON v. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv82898
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLASTICS COMPANY, INC., LEAR CORPORATION, WALLS AUTO AND TRACTOR PARTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY MAE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05364
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Actuate Corporation v. Lear Corporation
as 3:2010cv02798
Plaintiff:
Actuate Corporation
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gleese v. Lear Corporation
as 1:2010cv10025
Plaintiff:
David Gleese
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
ThirdParty Defendant:
Rick L Solomon
Chamberlain Group, Inc., The et al v. Lear Corporation
as 1:2009mc00131
Plaintiff:
Chamberlain Group, Inc., The and Johnson Controls Interiors LLC
Defendant:
Lear Corporation
Lear Corporation v. TS Tech USA Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00993
Plaintiff:
Lear Corporation, Lear Corporation and Lear Corporation
Defendant:
TS Tech USA Corporation, TS Tech USA Corporation, TS Tech USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07366
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157 Motion to Withdraw Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
