Cases 21 - 30 of 4,529
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Derrick Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Lewis
as 4:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Morshanda Lewis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Ellis v. Lewis et al
as 5:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Keiah Ellis
Defendant:
Crystal Lewis and Angelique Coats
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Fast Auto and Payday Loans, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lewis
Defendant:
Fast Auto and Payday Loans, Inc.
Lewis v. Cox Operating L L C et al
as 6:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Cox Operating L L C, Cox Lochridge P&A and Cox Oil Offshore
Claimant:
Jackie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
Jackson County, David Futch, Keith Miller and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez v. Greening et al
as 4:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Ramirez
Defendant:
Craig Alan Greening, Wayne Dicky, Jessica Escue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 24-50115
Petitioner:
Billy Wayne Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
