Cases 1 - 10 of 39
In Re: JAMP Pharma Corporation
as 3:2023mc00108
In Re:
JAMP Pharma Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Leo John Seman, Danping Li and Rolf Grempler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Richardson v. Pham et al
as 3:2023cv01480
Plaintiff:
Neil Richardson
Defendant:
Willy L. Pham and Bi-Li Aviation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
In Re: Sandoz Canada Inc.et al
as 3:2023mc00059
In Re:
Sandoz Canada Inc. and Sun Pharma Canada, Inc. and Sun Pharma Canada Inc
Petitioner:
Sandoz Canada Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Danping Li, Leo John Seman, Leon Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Domesick v. JD E-Commerce America Limited et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Michael Domesick
Defendant:
JD E-Commerce America Limited, JD.Com American Technologies Corporation, JingDong E-Commerce (Trade) Hong Kong Corporation Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lis v. Saez et al
as 3:2021cv00745
Defendant:
Luis Saez and Patrick Carroll
Plaintiff:
Kristal Lis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sun v. Beauty Lala Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01925
Defendant:
Jidong Wu, Guanhua Huang, Lujing Wu and others
Plaintiff:
Mengni Sun
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lors v. Papoosha et al
as 3:2019cv00906
Defendant:
Papoosha, Jane Doe, Lis and others
Plaintiff:
Jadrien Lors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01907
Defendant:
Lis, Kenneth Butricks, White and others
Plaintiff:
Treizy Treizon Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
