Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Eddrell Scott v. Vedora Hinshaw, et al
as 23-2594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
VEDORA HINSHAW and CHRISTINE LIEDTKE, Psy.D.
Liedtke v. The City of Austin
as 1:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Samantha Liedtke
Defendant:
The City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Robertson v. Fagan et al
as 3:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Herbert E Robertson
Defendant:
Karen Fagan, Sherri Fritter, Theresa Liedtke and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. LIEDTK et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIEDTK, WEXFORD LLC/CENTURION, REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. WARDEN OF PENDLETON et al
as 1:2022cv01903
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WHITE
Defendant:
WARDEN OF PENDLETON and LIEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01792
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and DR. CHRISTINE LIEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01798
Plaintiff:
GREG TAYLOR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, DR. HEATHER VERDON, DR. CHRISTINE LIEDTKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. LIEDTKE et al
as 1:2022cv01746
Plaintiff:
GREG TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINE LIEDTKE, BUZAN, RAZOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Virgil Eugene Griffin and Virgil Griffin
Defendant:
Nancy Marthakis, Tiffany Turner, Jennifer Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Christian Liedtke
as 22-80091
Respondent:
In re: CHRISTIAN W. LIEDTKE, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: April 16, 2020
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
