Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Taylor v. LL Flooring, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Defendant:
LL Flooring, Inc., Lumber Liquidator Inc. and Michael Klinga
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Taylor, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
BOTNER et al v. LL FLOORING, INC.
as 1:2023cv02314
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. BOTNER and DIANA BOTNER
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cami Stein v. LL Flooring, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01269
Defendant:
LL Flooring, Inc., Lumber Liquidators, Inc., David T. Stein and others
Plaintiff:
Cami Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Cami Stein v. LL Flooring, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04736
Plaintiff:
Cami Stein
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc., LL Flooring, Inc. f/k/a Lumber Liquidators, Inc., David T. Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04507
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04507
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC.
as 2:2022cv04506
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC and LL FLOORING DESIGNS
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carla Kappel v. LL Flooring, Inc.
as 22-1643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA J. KAPPEL, as mother and next friend of K.I.T, a minor and A.J.T, a minor as Special Administrator of the Estate of Ozan Tarabus, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation and LL FLOORING, INC., f/k/a Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
