Cases 21 - 30 of 920
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1152
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Ontravarious, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Chief Clerk and all Clerks Involved from Miller County, AR and others
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pertee v. Risher
as 24-10027
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bruce Pertee
Defendant:
David Risher, CEO Lyft, Incorporated, Logan Green, CEO Lyft President, Chris Lambert, CEO Lyft and others
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
