Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sharita Gordon v. Township of Haverford, et al
as 26-2336
Plaintiff:
SHARITA GORDON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF HAVERFORD, DETECTIVE JOSEPH FULLER, KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026at00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jeremy Smallwood v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II, et al
as 26-11752
Plaintiff:
JEREMY L. SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP II, LOSSE, MELISSA PIQUION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv23258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dancekelly, et al. v. Deloitte, LLP, et al.
as 26-2261
Plaintiff:
TANYA DANCEKELLY, ADVANCED WEIGHT LOSS SURGICAL ASSOCIATION and MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
DELOITTE, LLP and DOES
Vincent Rice v. Crayman Harvey
as 26-1408
Plaintiff:
VINCENT JERMAINE RICE, a/k/a Majestic
Defendant:
ERNEST T. REYNOLDS, Columbia Police Officer, EMILY DUNCAN BURN, 5th Circuit Solicitor for Richland Counsel, OFFICER E J LIPSCOMB, loss prevention and others
Premera Blue Cross v. Transform Weight Loss LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01162
Plaintiff:
Premera Blue Cross
Defendant:
Northwest Revenue Cycle Management, Transform Weight Loss LLC and Peter Billing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv02695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
