Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Jerry Darnell v. Lee Howard, IV, et al
as 16-60315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEE DARNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LEE HOWARD, IV, Circuit Court Judge, FORREST ALLGOOD, District Attorney, MARK JACKSON, Assistant District Attorney and others
Hopkins et al v. Lowndes County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Cicely Hopkins and Kristen Smith
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Department , Lowndes County Chancery Clerk , Lowndes County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lowndes County Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Petitioner:
Eric Darnell Harris
Respondent:
Lowndes County Detention Center, Lowndes County Sheriff Department, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fuhgetaboutit, LLC et al v. Columbus Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Fuhgetaboutit, LLC , Golden Horn, Inc. and Frederic Fields
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department, Lowndes County Sheriff's Department, Columbus-Lowndes Metro Narcotics Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorothy Jarvis, et al v. Lowndes County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 10-12861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY M. JARVIS and JARRETT W. JARVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Jarvis et al v. Lowndes County Sheriff's Department et al
as 7:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Jarvis and Jarrett W. Jarvis
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff's Department and Lowndes County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Lowndes County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00928
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Allen
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff's Department, Laura Gresham, O. J. Strother and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
