Cases 1 - 10 of 64
HOLLIMON v. LOPEZ-RIVERA et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
OBIE DEWYANE HOLLIMON
Defendant:
LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, CENTURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PROVIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. FORRESTER-TROUPE et al
as 3:2023cv10297
Plaintiff:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant:
KENA FORRESTER-TROUPE, LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, KRISTAL AKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo v. Ixco et al
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo and Jose Ruiz Lopez
Defendant:
Ixco, M. Manker, Mastel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Shinn
as 4:2022cv00401
Petitioner:
Xavier Luis Lopez
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Lopez v. USA
as 22-11247
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE LUIS LOPEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez v. USA
as 4:2022cv00311
Petitioner:
Luis Lopez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lopez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv20747
Plaintiff:
George Luis Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
