Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Rivas v. Therma LLC
as 2:2026cv09567
Plaintiff:
Luis Rivas
Defendant:
Therma LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Goodman v. Merritt Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv07061
Plaintiff:
Ayrton Ramos Goodman
Defendant:
Merritt Hospitality, LLC doing business as HEI Hotels & Resorts, Kelly Petruzziello, Ann Alleyne and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03245
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02302
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00030
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivas v. Rivas
as 1:2025cv00357
Plaintiff:
Luis Rivas and Popeye
Defendant:
Veronica Debbie Rivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Rivas
as 24-1312
Defendant:
LUIS RIVAS, DENNIS CABRERA, Inquieto and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Crown Iron Works Company v. Farias et al
as 0:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
Crown Iron Works Company
Defendant:
Ariel Farias, Luis Rivas and Scott Taff
United States of America v. Amador-Rios (Salvador)
as 24-656
Defendant:
MELVI AMADOR-RIOS, SANTOS AMADOR-RIOS, YAN CARLOS RAMIREZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Amador-Rios
as 23-7930
Defendant:
SANTOS AMADOR-RIOS, YAN CARLOS RAMIREZ, ANTONIO SALVADOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVI AMADOR-RIOS, Letal and Pinky
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
