Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Eminence Corporation of Maryland v. Pierluisi-Urrutia et al
as 3:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
EMINENCE CORPORATION OF MARYLAND
Defendant:
Pedro Pierluisi-Urrutia, Manuel Cidre-Miranda, Treasury Department of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rivera v. Cologne et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Luis Rivera
Defendant:
Cologne, Warden, Commissioner and others
Other:
Scanning Program - Corrigan Radgowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Pomales et al v. Delgado et al
as 3:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Alberto Luis Rivera-Pomales, Aranzasu Adorno-Rivera and Jessica Jaksich Delgado
Defendant:
Reymundo Delgado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
United States of America v. Suero (Darge)
as 24-459
Defendant:
JOSE GERMAN RODRIGUEZ-MORA, ALBERTO REYES, MANUEL ALADINO SUERO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25334
Plaintiff:
LUIS RIVERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera Padilla v. Garland
as 22-495
Petitioner:
LUIS RIVERA PADILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
RIVERA-SOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08772
Plaintiff:
LUIS RIVERA-SOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
GERARDO LUIS RIVERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
Luis Rivera
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
