Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
James v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv05546
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Instagram, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Luke James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Christopher Neace, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Kopp v. Tice-Raskin et al
as 2:2023cv02631
Plaintiff:
Luke James Kopp
Defendant:
S. Robert Tice-Raskin and Susan Kay McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RYBINSKI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10793
Plaintiff:
LUKE JAMES RYBINSKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grunwald v. Brown County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
Luke James Grunwald
Defendant:
Brown County Detention Facility, Officer Pratt, Cpl Bartels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLDENBURG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14904
Plaintiff:
LUKE JAMES OLDENBURG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LITTLEFIELD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68158
Plaintiff:
LUKE JAMES LITTLEFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Luke James Stobie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
