Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Braden v. Benton et al
as 3:2023cv03588
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Benton, David Bartoni, Anthony Skobel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wakefield v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv01768
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Anthony Scoble, S. Barra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, JUDITH PROFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, MICHELLE MCCUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lytle v. Clague et al
as 4:2019cv04209
Defendant:
David Clague, Tracy Burgard, Brad Abernathy and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lytle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCRUGGS v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
LEE HOEFLING, CAROL DILLON, CHARLIE DUGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. CORIZON HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv00243
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, FINOTE ASFAW, BRYAN BULLER and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Kabaker et al
as 3:2016cv03132
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Richard Abel Kabaker, James Sterr, Ann Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAINES v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Defendant:
CONNIE ALLEN, BRYAN BULLER, FARRAH BUNCH and others
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. LYTLE et al
as 1:2016cv00281
Defendant:
CITY OF CARMEL, OFFICER BLAKE LYTLE, CHAPMAN MIKE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WAYNE REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
