Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Gaydos v. Select Portfolio Serv. Inc., et al
as 19-1186
Trustee:
BANK OF AMERICA and JOHN J. AQUINO
Appellant:
MICHAEL GAYDOS
Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, successor trustee to Bank of America, NA, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank NA, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-OA1 and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
Robinson v. US Bank NA
as 3:2019cv00101
Plaintiff:
Karen Armelin Robinson
Defendant:
US BANK NA, as TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR in INTEREST to BANK OF AMERICA, NA as TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NA, as TRUSTEE FOR SACO I TRUST 2005-WM3 MORTGAGE BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Power Default Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutchinson v. Select Portfolio Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12443
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA as trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass-Through Cerficates Series 2006-AR17 Trust; U.S. BANK, NA, successor trustee to Bank o, Select Portfolio Services, Inc. and Doonan, Graves & Longoria, LLC
Plaintiff:
William L. Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaya Holman v. Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C., et al
as 18-10494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAYA HOLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, L.L.C. and US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor Trustee to Bank of America NA, as Successor to Lasalle Bank, NA, as Trustee for the Holders of the Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-1
Skarzynski et al v. U.S. Bank NA et al
as 3:2018cv30052
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Skarzynski and Joyce A. Skarzynski
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA , Lasalle Bank NA TR, Bear Stearns Asset-Backed and others
Counter_claimant:
Merscorp, Inc. , U.S. Bank NA , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Gary E. Skarzynski and Joyce A. Skarzynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Spesock et al v. U.S. Bank NA et al
as 2:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Spesock and Janet Spesock
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, NA , Bank of America, NA , LaSalle Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal v. U.S. Bank, NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor In Interest To Lasalle Bank, NA, As Trustee, On Behalf of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-OA6 et al
as 5:2017cv06471
Plaintiff:
Ralph B. Neal
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor In Interest To Lasalle Bank, NA, As Trustee, On Behalf of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-OA6 and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank N.A., successor Trustee to Bank of america, NA., sucessor to LaSalle Bank NA., as trustee on behalf of the holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2 v. Williams et al
as 4:2017cv40145
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank N.A., successor Trustee to Bank of america, NA., sucessor to LaSalle Bank NA., as trustee on behalf of the holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2
Defendant:
Arthur G. Williams and Anna Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, National Associatio v. Henry Varela, Jr.
as 17-15046
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank NA as Trustee for Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-5
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
HENRY A. VARELA, Jr.
U.S. Bank, National Associatio v. Henry Varela, Jr.
as 17-15046
Counter Claimant:
HENRY A. VARELA, Jr.
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank NA as Trustee for Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WMALT Series 2006-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
