Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,351
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Woodrow et al v. Doman et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff: Lacie Woodrow and Everett Meehling
Defendant: Evangeline Doman and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Canales v. Rayford et al
as 5:2024cv00655
Plaintiff: Ramiro Canales
Defendant: Senior Warden Phonso J. Rayford, Correctional Officer Vanessa Valero, Correctional Officer Ruth Trice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Dunn
as 24-10500
Plaintiff: Bradley B. Miller
Defendant: Virginia Talley Dunn, Individually, Andrea Plumlee, In both Individual and Official Capacities, Danielle Diaz, In both Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner: Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent: Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EMC Property & Casualty Company v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv01083
Plaintiff: EMC Property & Casualty Company
Defendant: Trevor Johnson, Crystal McMahon, Courtney Counter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Lacy McNeilIn re: Lacy McNeil
as 24-50381
Petitioner: In re: Lacy McNeil
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lacy
as 8:2024cv01145
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Tyrone J Lacy
In re: Walmart Inc. Securities Litigation, et al, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff: KIM KENGLE, as trustee of the Kim K.Kengle 2000 Trust and ROSEANNE LACY
Defendant: WALMART INC, C. DOUGLAS MCMILLON and M. BRETT BIGGS, JR.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?