Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Forse v. First Transit, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03879
Defendant:
First Transit, Inc., Laidlaw Transit, Inc. and Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Forse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Davis v. Laidlaw Transit Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kissne Davis and Kissne Davis
Defendant:
Laidlaw Transit Inc and First Student Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Education Logistics, Inc., et al v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
as 09-35601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDUCATION LOGISTICS, INC., a Montana corporation and LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, INC., a Washington corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coleman v. American Home Assurance Company et al
as 4:2008cv01660
Plaintiff:
Edna Coleman
Defendant:
American Home Assurance Company and Laidlaw Transit, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COPELAND v. NIXON et al
as 3:2008cv04875
Plaintiff:
YVETTE MERLICE COPELAND
Defendant:
JAMES OTTO NIXON, GREYHOUND LINES, INC., LAIDLAW TRANSIT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Health Svc & Ins Plan v. Laidlaw Transit Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01391
Plaintiff:
Health Svc & Ins Plan
Defendant:
Laidlaw Transit Inc and Michael C. Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00883
Defendant:
Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RATLIFF v. LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC
as 3:2008cv00124
Plaintiff:
RENEE W RATLIFF
Defendant:
LAIDLAW TRANSIT INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
