Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lamon v. Raoul et al
as 3:2026cv01507
Defendant: C. Hale, Sarah J. Lukas, Jeanine R. Armstrong and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Lamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Frazier v. USA
as 26-13900
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: ANTHONY LAMON FRAZIER
Bonner v. Richardson et al
as 9:2026cv03952
Plaintiff: Victor Lamone Bonner
Defendant: Stacy Richardson and Joel Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamons v. Thompson et al
as 3:2026cv00921
Plaintiff: Tristen Lamons
Defendant: Dixon Correctional Institution, Octavia Thompson, Malik Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Larry et al
as 1:2026cv10243
Plaintiff: Charlie Booker
Defendant: Catherine Larry, John Benson, Jane Bergholtz and others
: Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winfield v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2026cv00599
Plaintiff: Cedric Lamon Winfield, Jr.
Defendant: Unknown Defendant
Interested Party: Pro Se Department and U.S. Attorney Civil Process
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lamons et al v. IB Appliances US Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08089
Plaintiff: Sally Lamons and Corelle Brands, ULC
Defendant: Corelle Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bonner v. Hicks et al
as 4:2026cv02715
Plaintiff: Victor Lamone Bonner
Defendant: John Hicks and Sheriff Breeden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Tony Gooch, III v. Christopher Gomez
as 26-5576
Petitioner: TONY LAMONS GOOCH, III
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden
OWENS v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv01087
Plaintiff: LAMON OWENS
Defendant: PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?