Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Smith v. USA
as 7:2021cv00055
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Davin Lamont Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00316
Respondent: J. Johnson
Petitioner: Lamont Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Paige We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00043
Plaintiff: Kendall Lamonte Smith
Defendant: A. Paige
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19700
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: LAMONT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. LNU et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01156
Plaintiff: Kendall Lamonte Smith
Defendant: FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81897
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: MARQUEST LAMONT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brad Smith v. USA
as 20-12981
Petitioner / Appellant: BRAD LAMONT SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Dart et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01381
Plaintiff: Lamont Smith
Defendant: Cook County, Illinois and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith, Diorian v. Haure, Michael We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00097
Defendant: Michael Haure
Plaintiff: Diorian Howard Lamont Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv21109
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
Plaintiff: DARREN LAMONT SMITH
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?