Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Eric Lamont Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv02542
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and James B. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shaunte Lamont Johnson Sr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2023cv01968
Petitioner:
Shaunte Lamont Johnson, Sr.
Respondent:
Ms. Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iran Lamont Johnson v. Jim Robertson
as 2:2022cv06215
Petitioner:
Iran Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Jim Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antoine Johnson v. USA
as 19-55717
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTOINE LAMONT JOHNSON, AKA O Killer, AKA OK, AKA Seal A
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02034
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
USA v. Anthony Johnson
as 18-30105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY LAMONT JOHNSON, AKA Anthony L. Johnnson
Johnson v. Tempe, City of
as 4:2017cv00582
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Tempe, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaunte Lamont Johnson, Sr. v. D. Asuncion
as 5:2017cv02076
Respondent:
D. Asuncion
Petitioner:
Shaunte Lamont Johnson, Sr.
Johnson v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00508
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03680
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
