Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Webb v. King County et al
as 2:2018cv01090
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Washington, King County, Public Defenders Association and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v Superior Court of the State of Washington King County et al
as 2:2018cv00762
Plaintiff:
Anthony Webb
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of Washington King County, Bill A. Bowman, Kelsey K Schirman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Lapp, Jr.
as 18-35296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM MICHAEL LAPP, Jr.
Lappe v. Clark et al
as 3:2017cv01410
Plaintiff:
Elmer Lappe
Defendant:
Clark, McLay and Legal Representative
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lapp, JR. v. USA
as 6:2016cv00054
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Michael Lapp, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Organo Gold Int'l Inc v Sunrise Naturals LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01816
Plaintiff:
Organo Gold Int'l Inc
Defendant:
Sunrise Naturals, LLC and Chester Lapp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Elise Porter v. ADOC, et al
as 12-17337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELISE PORTER, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Earl Ray Lappe
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a division of the State of Arizona and STATE OF ARIZONA
Antoinette Johnson et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05048
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Plaintiff:
April Hinton, Eunice Kay Hobbs, Paul Hobbs, Jr and others
Lappe v. Mental Health Services of Arizona
as 2:2012cv00071
Petitioner:
Elmer J Lappe, Jr.
Respondent:
Mental Health Services of Arizona, Arizona Behavioral Health Services Department, Mesa Crisis Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lapp, JR. v. USA
as 6:2011cv00069
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Michael Lapp, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
