Cases 1 - 10 of 409
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newman et al v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Newman, Latosha Newman, Joyce Newman and others
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Sheriff Larry R Smith, John Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
White v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Counter Defendant:
Marques White
Defendant:
Larry Lee Smith, Jr., Transco, Inc., and/or McClane MFS Fleet, Inc and McLane Foodservice Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Contreras v. Sheriff Larry Smith
as 6:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Benito Contreras, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Madery et al
as 2:2023cv12703
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Defendant:
Brian Madery, D. Brassfield, Jennifer Norder and others
SMITH JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10840
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOHN SMITH JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larry Smith v. Kim Cargor
as 23-1768
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DAVID SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM CARGOR, Warden
Larry Smith v. Kim Cargor
as 23-1758
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY DAVID SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM CARGOR, Warden
Derrick Deon Horton v. Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
as 5:2023cv01061
Plaintiff:
Derrick Deon Horton
Defendant:
Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
