Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Larry Smith
as 23-5519
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY EVERETT SMITH
USA v. Larry Smith
as 22-5559
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LARRY EVERETT SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv07636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bourque v. Lady of the Sea Hospital et al
as 2:2018cv07459
Defendant:
Chad Vining, Tim Callais, Guy LeFort and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Everette Bourque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv00331
Plaintiff:
Larry Everett Nichols
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HODGE v. USA
as 3:2015cv00042
Petitioner:
LARRY EVERETT HODGE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hebert et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Hebert , Charles Hollingsworth , Dyane McDonald and others
Defendant:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, Sentry Insurance a Mutual Company, Burlington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hebert et al v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00530
Plaintiff:
Michael Hebert , Charles Hollingsworth , Dyane McDonald and others
Defendant:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company, Burlington Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
