Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jarvis v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2023cv01935
Plaintiff:
Larry Jarvis
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Latson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Reginald Cornelius Latson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Marion Correctional Treatment Center, Dara Robichaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrel White v. Dwayne Turner
as 16-6225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREL A. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
DWAYNE TURNER, Unit Manager, JEFFREY ARTRIP, EBP Manager, LIEUTENANT DAY and others
Defendant:
R.C. MATHENA, Warden, J.B. MESSER, Institutional Ombudsman/Grievance Coordinator, CURTIS PARR, Regional Ombudsman and others
Adrian Robinson v. Marion Correctional
as 15-7309
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION CORRECTIONAL AND TREATMENT CENTER, LARRY JARVIS, MCTC, V. WILLIAMS, Institutional Program Manager and others
Adrian Robinson v. Marion Correctional
as 15-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARION CORRECTIONAL AND TREATMENT CENTER, LARRY JARVIS, MCTC, V. WILLIAMS, Institutional Program Manager and others
Adrian Robinson v. Larry Jarvi
as 15-7300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY JARVIS, VICKI WILLIAMS, PAMELA SHUMATE and others
Adrian Robinson v. Larry Jarvis
as 15-7300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY JARVIS, VICKI WILLIAMS, PAMELA SHUMATE and others
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00441
Defendant:
Dr. Battiata, Dr. Bishop, Ms. Bruce and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Johnson et al
as 7:2010cv00411
Defendant:
Dr. Battiata, Dr. Bishop, Ms. Bruce and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
