Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026hc02015
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
A lingle et al v. TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Ansul Company et al
as 2:2025cv12462
Plaintiff:
Gregory A lingle, Paula Akins, Hansa Anand and others
Defendant:
TYCO FIRE PRODUCTS LP, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Ansul Company, United Technologies Corporation, UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORP., INC. (f/k/a GE Interlogix, Inc.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilkins, et al. v. United States of America
as 25-37
Plaintiff:
JANE B. STANTON and LARRY STEVEN WILKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wraspir v. Custer County Jail
as 5:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Tyler Wraspir
Defendant:
Custer County Jail, Dan Day, Dean Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00360
Plaintiff:
Larry Steven Lopez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Larry Wilkins, et al v. USA
as 20-35745
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY STEVEN WILKINS and JANE B. STANTON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Higginbotham v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00899
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc and BP America Production Company
Plaintiff:
Larry Steven Higginbotham
Stevens v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02764
Plaintiff:
Larry Stevens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higginbotham v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv11010
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Steven Higginbotham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
